Fundamental Theory Of Existence. 1. Zero cannot exist as denominator. 2. Anything cannot be created out of nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere. 3. Anything cannot be destroyed into nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere. 4. Existence of anything cannot be infinite. 5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World. 6. There are finite absolute laws. 7. Velocity of light is relative. 8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only. 9.Time Travel is impossible. 10.Tan 90 cannot exist. 11. God(s) cannot exist. Fundamental Theory Of Existence. What is infinite? Infinite = Not finite. If any number is finite then Infinite cannot be a number and, use of INFINITE as a number in LIMITS/Mathematics is one of the biggest mistake ever. Mathematicians and students all over the World use INFINITE as a number and draw conclusions such as “It is Not Definted/Undefined "... Sadly this is wrong. Numbers being infinite is a property of number and, no number can ever equal INFINITY... INFINITY is not a number. Any number, however large or small is always finite. So, no number is ever infinite. Numbers are infinite. Numbers being infinite is one of the properties of the numbers. Numbers don't have physical existence. Undefined or Not defined means it has no definite solution. When you divide any number with zero it can never be said as Undefined. When you place an Apple on the table and eat it then you can say there is no Apple on the table. That is... There is nothing on the table! Zero = Nothing. If Zero is Mathematics and, Nothing is English and, Nothingness is Physics then how can I say... THEY ARE CONNECTED! Mathematics is some form of Truth or Law. Also English and Physics are some forms of Truth and Laws. The M, E and, P words are different names but they are all truths or laws governing the World or Universe. So “nothing” is not just an M or E or P word, it is all! When you say (Apple/Zero) then you mean Apple destroyed into Zero. How? 1/2 means 1 cut into 2. So, 1/0 means 1 cut into 0. If 1 Apple can be cut into 0 or if 0 can give birth to 1 Apple then 1/0 has an answer but, it is not possible. The answer to 1/0 is not Undefined, it is Impossible. So, 1/0 is impossible. It is said that 0/0 is Indeterminate... Is it so? How? Why not? No, it is not indeterminate. And, why is it so? Because, when you divide with anything then the denominator is given the first preference... it is not just preference, it is the truth or common sense or logic. Anything divided by 0 is said to be 0. And, it is true because 0 in the numerator means you have nothing to divide. So, you are not given the Apple in the first place. How can you eat an Apple if you don't have any? So, what is 0/0 then? When you are dividing some number with another number then the number that acts as the denominator is the first thing that is important, not the other way around. So, when you are asked to divide an Apple into two parts you don't say... here... take this two Apples! It is, two halves of the 1 Apple. So, division of an Apple into zero parts is impossible. And, 0/0 doesn't mean you have nothing to divide, it means you can't divide anything (even 0) into 0 parts. When you say 0/0, there are no two things such as... First thing: 0 in the numerator meaning “Nothing to divide "... Second thing: 0 in the denominator meaning “Divide the numerator into nothing ". The “Second thing “is the correct answer. Why? Because, 1/2 doesn't mean 1/2 = 1! It means 1/2 = 0.5. So, the denominator is the first thing that is to be used. Therefore... 1. Zero cannot exist as denominator. The fact that the numerator cannot be divided into zero parts means anything that exists cannot be destroyed into nothingness. And the fact that sum of zeroes gives us zero alone means anything that does not exist cannot be given existence out of nothingness. Therefore... 2. Anything cannot be created out of nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere. 3. Anything cannot be destroyed into nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere. Once again we need to know what infinite means. What does infinite mean? Infinite means not finite and not finite means Unlimited. By now we know that creation and destruction are Impossible. If creation is impossible then there is no other way new things can add up to the World that already exists. If new things can not add up to the World then there is no way anything that exists in this World can be infinite. Space cannot be infinite. Anything that has physical existence can't be infinite. Space has physical existence. Numbers don't have physical existence. The word Apple doesn't have physical existence but the edible Apple in your hand has physical existence and the edible Apples in your hands can't be infinite. Also, Time is never Absolute, it is always Relative and, it has no physical existence. Time is a measure of Change and sometimes Change is a turn of events, events can be numbered to an extent and, existence of more than one event of the same part of World or Universe is impossible. So, Time can never be infinite. Therefore... 4. Existence of anything cannot be infinite. Numbers are infinite but number of apples (existence) cannot be infinite. Now, we know that creation and destruction are impossible and we also know that the existence of anything cannot be infinite. We are part of the world we live in. In our world existence of anything cannot be infinite. That is Space, Mass, Energy, Density, Gravity, Force, etc.; cannot be infinite. Also, in our World creation and destruction are impossible. Creation is impossible means no new things can add up to the World that already exists and it also means what already exists cannot come out of creation. Creation is impossible, creation is completely ruled out. We also know that destruction of the World is impossible. Space is timeless. Therefore... 5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World. According to the fourth postulate space cannot be infinite and according to the fifth postulate space is timeless. We know what an equation means. An equation is a law of equity. If creation and destruction are possible then all laws have to fail. In a World where creation and destruction are possible laws cannot exist, only Chaos exists. We know what infinity means. Infinity means not finite and it means infinity is something that is unlimited, something that is ever increasing. Positive infinity is ever increasing and negative infinity is ever decreasing. Infinity means unlimited and it can not be used in equations. If creation is possible, equations will fail. Therefore... 6. There are finite absolute laws. There is a small problem with the sixth postulate and it is... If you take F=ma or E=mc2(c square) or such similar equations then these type of Absolute laws are finite indeed. But if you consider that a single couple, Mother and Father who can live forever and can give birth to unlimited/infinite children and if you consider each child's Individuality/brain-pattern as a different Absolute law then Absolute laws are infinite. It is clear that every child from same Parents is different/never-the-same and different parents from Different races, species, families too can give birth to unique off springs and life is unlimited when it comes to small variations. It is true that unlimited life has something in common/same, something similar and something different but it is true that Life comes in unlimited variations. Where Albert Einstein went wrong... Proof of Velocity of Light being Relative to Gravity. Albert Einstein: Special Relativity Theory 1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial (=non- accelerating) reference frames, and 2. The speed of light in free space is constant. General Theory of Relativity Clocks which are far from massive bodies (or at higher gravitational potentials) run faster, and clocks close to massive bodies (or at lower gravitational potentials) run slower. This is because gravitational time dilation is manifested in accelerated frames of reference or, by virtue of the equivalence principle, in the gravitational field of massive objects. Albert Einstein in his Special Theory of Relativity said that Velocity of Light is Constant in Free Space. That is, Velocity of Light is Constant on the Surface of the Earth or on the Surface of the Moon. But, it's not so. I beg to differ on it and here is my explanation. Ordinary body is measured in terms of MASS. Total Energy is equal to the Sum of Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy. For ordinary body-Gravity is Directly Proportional to Change in Velocity per Time. Velocity of Light is constant when it is measured on the surface of the Earth i.e.; it's Constant where ever there is No Considerable Change in Gravity. What happens when the Velocity of the Same Light (Same Source, Same Conditions - Except Gravity) is measured on the Surface of the Earth and on the Surface of the Moon? According to Albert Einstein it must be Constant. But, I beg to differ. It's not constant and here is why?! For ordinary body we have “MASS " but when it comes to LIGHT we have “ENERGY/MASS” since Energy = Product of Mass and Velocity Square. E=m c (square). P.E=mgh P.E is Directly Proportional to mgh m mass g gravity h height or distance P.E/m is proportional to gh where h=vt P.E/mvt proportional to g For ordinary body g is proportional to v/t For Light g is proportional to E/mvt, since Light is a form of energy with mass Let's take t (Time) as constant?! On different places such as Surface of the Earth and, Surface of the Moon... Gravity is different... If Gravity is different Changes are different and Change is a measure of Time. So, Time is not constant or same on different places such as Earth and Moon. But, it doesn't differ by much. So when it's ordinary body... Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity. But, when we take Light into account... 1. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is proportional to E/mv i.e.; Change in Gravity leads to Change in Velocity of Light]. As gravity increases velocity of light decreases and when gravity is lesser then the velocity of light is more when compared to a location where gravity is more... So, Velocity of Light on Earth is lesser than Velocity of Light on Moon. For ordinary body Acceleration is directly proportional to Velocity (When Gravity increases Velocity of a free falling object increases... and, when it comes to Light Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity... So, as Gravity increases Velocity of Light decreases. Why? Because, Light is a product of both Energy and Mass unlike an ordinary body which is a product of Mass alone. So, as Gravity increases Velocity of Light decreases. So velocity of Light is more in space (where there is little gravity) and on the Moon (where the Gravity is lesser than that on the Earth) when compared to Velocity of Light on Earth. Also in Space P.E = Gm1m2/r and g = Gm/r square And, this results in So when it's ordinary body... Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity. But, when we take Light into account... 1. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is proportional to E/mv i.e.; Change in Gravity leads to Change in Velocity of Light]. When we take E/m into consideration... g is inversely proportional to v. Here is a better explanation... E = m c square So, for light g t = E/mc g t is inversely proportional to c and, for ordinary body (ordinary body in a sense mass is taken into consideration unlike mass and energy for light) For a Body of mass m g t = v g t is directly proportional to v For any body with Energy/Mass g t = E/mv g t is inversely proportional to v According to Albert Einstein's Special Theory Of Relativity... Velocity of light is constant in free space and, According to General Theory Of Relativity... it is relative when there is difference in gravity. That is... When Clocks run slower (When Time is relatively lower) i.e.; when Gravity is more Velocity of light is lesser... similarly it is more when gravity is lesser. g t = E/mc That is... gt inversely proportional to c. According to Albert Einstein Velocity of light depends upon Gravity-Time but not Relativistic Mass. Therefore, it is same/constant on a moving Train and on Land. Where as it varies where there is change in Gravity- Time. Actually Light has RELATIVISTIC MASS... And, that is why I say it varies with Gravity. For a Body of mass m g t = v g t is directly proportional to v Light... E = m c square So, for light g t = E/mc g t is inversely proportional to c Therefore, velocity of light is relative not just because of General Theory Of Relativity but also due to the fact that light has relativistic mass and anything with greater E/m value than light can travel faster than light. Velocity of light is relative because of Gravity-Time (Clocks running faster or slower) and also because Gravity attracts light (Relativistic mass). Why is it that the velocity of light is same on both the Train and on Land? The reason is... When you carry an Apple with you on a moving train then the Apple has the train's velocity and it has no velocity on land. And, when you carry light! Carry light? When you have a source of light on a train and on land velocity of light is observed to be one and the same and, it is because we don't carry light, we don't get hold of light, we carry light source but not light. Light is generated at the source and it travels on its own. Therefore velocity of light is observed to be constant in free space. But, Light can't escape the Train called Gravity. When Light travels through the Train called Gravity it has a (both because of General Theory Of Relativity and due to Gravity attraction of Relativistic Mass) relative velocity. In light's case gravity is inversely proportional to its velocity. Velocity of light is constant in free space and is relative with respect to change in gravity both due to General Theory Of Relativity and also due to its Relativistic Mass. Gravity bending Space is something I don't know and don't understand too. If Space is something, emptiness that can be occupied what does Space occupy? How can it be bent if it doesn't occupy anything? If Space=Emptiness then how can it be bent? There are equations quoting Space is bent also there are some cosmic observations that are said to prove this bending phenomenon but, I don't understand it. I think Gravity bends light and everything that has physical existence (but not space???), also time has no physical existence but it is a result of something that has physical existence so time too is dependent on gravity. Everything is connected! Gravity connects everything! Gravity controls velocities... If gravity lensing is true, why do planets deviate from circular orbits? I have nothing against Gravity lensing... I don't even know the theory and mathematics behind it... I only think Gravity bends light and that is what makes me think that gravity bending light is a one of the facts and gravity lensing is a different factor... According to Gravity Lensing light travels in a straight line and looks like it is bent due to bent space... According to me... Gravity lensing can be true but gravity bending light is definitely true. Gravity bends light. Space or Emptiness or anything that has existence can't be infinite according to Fundamental Theory Of Existence and it is also true that anything that has physical existence or anything that is influenced by anything that has physical existence is in turn influenced by gravity. Therefore emptiness or space too is influenced by gravity and has physical properties and therefore gravity lensing can be true? Is gravity lensing true? There is no doubt Space and or Emptiness has properties and it is so because it has existence and can't be infinite. So, gravity lensing has a point to prove... Is it gravity bending everything else except emptiness or it is the finite emptiness that can be bent? Space/Emptiness has physical properties and is finite. Maxwell's equations state that "C" velocity of all EM waves is constant or is same in free space... If it is not same then we will get to see different positions of stars in the sky with varying spectra. So C in free space is constant but, it can't escape a train called gravity. So, C is not constant when there is change in gravity. Gravity controls velocity of everything, absolutely. Velocity of light on Earth's surface is lesser than velocity of light in free space. All EM waves travel with same speed in free space and their velocity varies with medium... also their velocity is controlled by gravity. Velocity of light or any EM wave varies with varying gravity and it is so, because of two reasons... Reason 1: Time varies with Gravity so C is different. Reason 2: C is inversely proportional to Gravity so with decrease in gravity c increases. According to reason 1... Time is faster when gravity is low and C is more and, according to reason 2... Gravity is low means gravity effect on mass E/m is lower so C is more. For an ordinary body as gravity increases the velocity of the body increases... If you drop an object from sky then the velocity of the object increases as it approaches the earth and that is because velocity is directly proportional to gravity and, if you measure the velocity of light focused from moon to earth its velocity is greater on moon, even greater where there is lesser gravity is slower on earth than that on the moon and that is so because EM waves are E/m waves and their velocity is inversely proportional to gravity. Therefore... 7. Velocity of light is relative. Theory Of Everything? Watch (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Strc2zRShXc). Theory Of Everything What does this video contain? Here it is... [1.] Theory of Everything? Is String Theory really a theory of everything? Why not? [2.] According to different string theories there are 10 or 11 spatial dimensions. [3.] The truth is there are three and three dimensions only. Refer to: http://sagargorijala.blogspot.in/ [4.] Time = Change Time is a measure of change. [5.] It is said that time is the 4th dimension. [6.] Time has no physical existence. [7.] There are 3 length and 1 time dimensions. [8.] What about more than 3 length/spatial dimensions? 10 length/spatial dimensions? 11 length/spatial dimensions? [9.] We sometimes study different parameters in 1 dimension and sometimes in 2 dimensions and also in 3 and 4 dimensions. [10.] Let us not talk about the time dimension. So here is what we have... 3 length/spatial dimensions. [11.] Is there anything in this World/Universe that is 1 dimensional? 1D? Really? [12.] The moment of truth... [13.] There is no such thing as 1D and 1D only... We simply neglect the other 2 length/spatial Ds. [14.] So... There is no such thing as1D only or 2D only... [15.] It is always 3D and 3D only. We simply neglect other Ds for our convenience. [16.] What about 10Ds and 11Ds??? [17.] The 3 Ds are mutually perpendicular to each other. [18.] If there are 10Ds or 11Ds... Wait! Let us talk about 4Ds only... Just for now! [19.] If 4th D does not exist, that leaves us with the answer: No 10 or 11 Ds. [20.] Now, to prove that 4th D does not exist. [21.] Here is the proof... [22.] The 3Ds are mutually perpendicular. If there is another D, 4th D then it will be mutually perpendicular to the measurable 3Ds? [23.] No way. [24.] So, There is no 4th D. [25.] If there is a 4th D then what? [26.] Let us take a look at the World if there is a 4th D. [27.] Density= (Mass/Volume) [28.] The formula for Volume is different for different 3D objects... Basically the formula is... [29.] Basically... Volume=Length x Breadth x Height Volume = 1st D x 2nd D x 3rd D. [30.] We know that Earth revolves around the Sun in 3Ds and if there is a 4th D then... [31.] If there is a 4th D then Density, Mass, Volume, Energy, Space and everything else change!!! Yes, EVERYTHING changes!!! [32.] So the 4th D... 1. Cannot be mutually perpendicular? 2. It can not be measured? 3. It cannot have a visual effect on Earth -- Sun relationship? [33.] There is no 4th D Or More... [34.] We know that Energy, Mass, and others have 1. Units and 2. Dimensions [35.] If String Theory says... There are more than 3 length/spatial Ds then it is wrong. [36.] If 3Ds are length/spatial, 4th D is time and other Ds (10 or 11 ) are Energy or Mass or something else then String Theory is really the Theory Of Everything. TOE. [37.] Therefore... There are 3 and 3 only length/spatial Ds. [38. LAST] Thanks for your valuable time, patience and undivided attention. Thanks again. Have a nice day/night! Goodbye. Song: Love Connects.mp3 Download it from mediafire: http://www.mediafire.com/?6zyi35sv9fexcwb Size: 428.57 KB My Theory: http://sagargorijala.blogspot.in/ My E-mail: nimzosagar@yahoo.co.uk Everything is well defined in three dimensions. Space too is three dimensional. String Theory claims more than three dimensions. Time is an imaginary dimension. Time is a measure of Change. There are three and only three Length/Spatial dimensions and one Time dimension. Existence of anything short of three dimensions is impossible since anything that exists cannot be destroyed into nothingness. If more than three dimensions can exist, they have to exist everywhere and always. Since anything cannot be created out of nothingness more than three dimensions cannot be given existence out of nothingness. Therefore String Theory cannot be true. Therefore anything short of three dimensions and more than three dimensions is impossible. Therefore... 8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only. Time travel! How do you define it? Can we go to past? If Past=Memory then we can possibly go to past. If going to past is like travelling from a city to a village then time travel is possible! May be going to past is possible depending upon how you define PAST. If Past is a physical World/Universe that is the precursor of the Present World/Universe then Time Travel is impossible. It is not only impossible but also meaningless. Why? Because, the so called Past World/Universe has changed into Present World/Universe and it is not two or more copies of The World... Thus, Time Travel is only a story or just another day dream! What about Future? Also Future is not another copy! So, it is also not possible. Wait! Is that all? Didn't I tell you... Time is a measure of Change. So more Gravity means slower changes and two places with different gravity will have different time or clock... Is that you call Time Travel? Really? Think twice! If so, Time Travel is indeed a reality and it is something that all Life has always experienced. How? Gravity is not the same everywhere... So, we have gone to places with varying gravity and thus we have made that amazing trip... The TRIP, The so called Time Travel Trip. There are no infinite parallel Worlds with infinite parallel changes and we cannot Time Travel. Time Travel is meaningless. Therefore... 9. Time Travel is impossible. It is said that... --> [At π/2 radians, or 90° (and -π/2, 3π/2, etc.) the function is officially undefined, because it could be positive Infinity or negative Infinity. ] Infinity is not a number and it can't replace an unknown number in Mathematics and it is erroneous to say the result as undefined. When we are in High School we are taught that two parallel lines never meet and a line with slope next to a straight line eventually meets the straight line at some point. This is not completely true. There are two cases. Case 1 is... 1) The line with slope never meets the straight line next to it. The line with slope never meets X axis or Y axis. and Case 2 is... 2) The line with slope intersects the straight line at some point. Case 1 example is XY=1 If X=0 we get 1=0 and If Y=0 we get 1=0 Therefore the line with slope never meets X-axis or Y-axis. The reason is... There are infinite numbers between 1 and 2 (or) 0.001 and 0.002 (or) any two different numbers. So in XY=1, X and Y can have smaller values but never zero, also they can have bigger values but never infinite... Let me remind you again... Infinite is not a number and the answer is never undefined. Case 2 example is X+Y=1. If X=0 the line with slope meets Y-axis. So there are three cases. Case-I Two parallel lines never meet. Case-II A line with slope never meets the X-axis or Y-axis. Case-III A line with slope meets the straight line next to it Tan 90 graph gives a line with slope and this line with slope never meets a straight line next to it. Why? There are three cases and they are... Case 1: Two parallel lines never meet. Case 2: A line with slope never meets a straight line next to it. Example is XY=1. Case 3: A line with slope does intersect X-axis and or Y-axis. Example is x+y=1. The “CASE -II “is the reason for first and tenth postulates. There are infinite numbers between 0.001 and 0.002. Tan 90 is same as 1/0. The first and the tenth postulates are one and the same! Therefore... 10. Tan 90 cannot exist. God(s) cannot create and God(s) can not destroy and God(s) can not change laws. God(s) cannot create laws and also can not destroy laws... Therefore God(s) cannot exist. Therefore... 11. God(s) cannot exist.